The 4th of July is a Sacred Day (2025 Edition)

The Truth about the American Dream and the People Who Founded Her

Introduction for 2025 Edition

Greetings Frens and Patriots,

I have promised to add new material to my piece about the 4^th of July every year. This year, I’d like to place my update at the very front—right here, right now—because I have something very startling to say:

I question almost the entirety of American History. I believe our founders took a stand for freedom and deserve eternal gratitude for their valiant fight. Almost every other detail about our history is up to question, in my book. In fact, I highly doubt that we ever truly broke free from England.

Two years ago I wrote an article entitled Is the Federal Reserve a British Institution? in which we learned that 4 out of the 5 first Supreme Court Justices were trained at the Middle Temple in London. This almost certainly means that our judiciary has been compromised since day one—and that’s a charitable interpretation of such facts!

We also know that Thomas Jefferson (an absolute hero in my eyes) sent many letters to others—fellow statesmen, acquaintances, etc—warning them that Britain was on the verge of successfully undoing all that he and the other founders had started.

In any event, I have a rather shocking theory about our history, going all the way up to the present day and the Q operation. I could be wrong, but it really looks to me as if…

The American Revolution didn’t fully succeed. We were powerful enough that they had to let us believe we “won”, whilst continuing to treat us as subjects using a variety of mostly-undetectable means. What we are experiencing right now with the Q operation is, in fact, the completion of what Jefferson et al started.

It’s a shocking theory, no doubt, but I highly recommend you read the above-mentioned article to begin to understand where I’m coming from. I’m currently going through old laws and proclamations myself to get a grip on the true circumstances of our founding.

As Vox Day often says, we may not know the true story, but what we DO know is that the mainstream are lying. Of that we can be certain.

My theory may indeed prove false, but it is proving to be an extremely useful guide for research, and I look forward to completing more articles in the future about this idea… Unless, of course, the Storm and Great Awakening happens before I’m finished with all this work, in which case all will be revealed anyways!

So without further ado, it’s onto the main event!

The 4th of July is a Sacred Day

Today is a glorious day!

For all Americans—and those who love her worldwide—the 4th of July is one of the most sacred of all days, and to celebrate this day, let us not only light some fireworks, let us do justice to the founders by sharing a bit of their history.

To love another person truly, you must desire to learn their story, and the same is true for entire cultures and nations. The halls of power in America have been hijacked—possibly since the very beginning—but this does not in any way diminish the significance of what the founders accomplished.

The Organized Murder of the Truth

If you read what so-called “historians” write these days, you’ll find that the founders are routinely slandered as evil “white supremacists” who, presumably, spent all day every day whipping Black people and natives purely for sport. They’re frequently portrayed as primordially sadistic, privileged fat-cats whose sole purpose for founding America was to increase their access to more money, more property, and more slaves to whip (ironically, that description is quite fitting for many of America’s enemies). This “genre” of slander is often extended to White people as an entire ethnicity—critical race theory, currently taught in elementary schools all over America, essentially describes White people as creatures of endless depravity, whose societies (especially America) are founded upon nothing but bloodlust.

This, of course, is nothing short of the most wicked slander imaginable, and those who knowingly use it as a weapon are in for a painful experience when it’s their turn to meet their Maker. Of this I’m certain.

By creating and promulgating such narratives, academicians and various media personalities have engaged in a process I call the organized murder of the truth. Like Napoleon supposedly once said, “history is a fable agreed upon”—to mold society a certain way, certain ideas need to become part of the “DNA” of culture, and other ideas must be ruthlessly suppressed and discarded. These days, culture itself is basically just another commercial product, and those who design said product(s) self-evidently despite White people, Christianity, and America.

One of the foundational texts of anti-Americanism (and anti-Whiteism) is a book entitled A People’s History of the United States, by Howard Zinn, which acts as a quasi “holy text” in the “crusade” that marxists have fomented against America. I must concede that Zinn’s book is an impressive piece of hypnotic propaganda, but to call it a work of historical scholarship is downright laughable. There is, in fact, almost no evidence to suggest that Zinn ever engaged in any real scholarly work—there are few notebooks full of notes, or dog-eared historical texts or anything of that nature in the inventory of his estate. Instead of doing legitimate scholarly work, he spent much of his time participating in various forms of protest/”social agitation”; tellingly, he never went to jail for such agitation, but many of his “students” did. See the book Debunking Howard Zinn for more on all this.

Zinn’s work has become the basis for much anti-American propaganda, but does it, itself, have anything approximating a valid basis? No. His book, again, is nothing more than a quasi “holy text” for those participating in the organized murder of the truth.

Correcting the Record

Did you know that Thomas Jefferson, even in his early twenties, regularly went to bat for the slaves? We know of at least six occasions prior to drafting the Declaration of Independence where he offered his services as a lawyer to argue on behalf of their freedom—and did so entirely at his own expense.

Did Jefferson own slaves? What about the other Founders?

The truth is, yes they did. Jefferson, in fact, purchased a number of slaves to PREVENT them from dying and starving. You read that correctly. He kept a rulebook at his estate for how to conduct operations at his plantation, and rule #1 was that all “laborers” were to be treated with the highest dignity regardless of what race they belonged to. The only example of a slave being whipped at Jeffersons estate happened when he wasn’t home, and it’s likely the case that whoever did that was banished permanently from his estate after breaking the rules.

The entire narrative surrounding slavery in America is lopsided and devoid of essential details that utterly exonerate the founders. The founders were NOT the ones that commissioned the slave ships—the Dutch East India Company, for the most part, are the ones that did that. Do you see how easy it is to misconstrue things?

To determine what their true stance on slavery was, I decided one day, many months ago, to do a deep dive on Wikipedia—not because I think Wikipedia is a valid source of historical knowledge, but because I wanted to appraise myself of mainstream history’s evidence to support the widely-accepted narrative that the founders were “pro slavery”. I got a list of all the signers of the Declaration of Independence, and then one by one went through each of their Wikipedia pages, searching for terms like “slave”, “slavery”, “enslave”, and so on.

Guess what I found? Only ONE of the signers said anything that could be reasonably construed as “pro slavery” (I’m not going to say who, because it’s not even certain that that remained his stance for his entire life, and I’m not going to participate in slander against these men). Based on much of what one hears these days, you’d think there’d be more than that, wouldn’t you?

I also looked through the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers, and the practice of slavery is almost entirely condemned there as well. In other words, whether you consult mainstream history, or the purported words of the early Americans themselves, it’s damn near impossible to find any genuine endorsement of slavery as a practice.

A Reasonable Explanation

So what are we to make of the fact that these men were vocally opposed to slavery, yet records indicate that many of them were slave owners themselves? This question requires some analysis.

Firstly, the slaves were imported en masse into America at the behest of British royalty and Dutch merchants (the Dutch East India Company and the like), not the Americans. Indeed, Jeffersons notebooks indicate that the plan, soon after declaring independence from Britain, was to begin the process of freeing the slaves—but do so in a gradual way. (Why gradual and not “all at once”? We’ll return to that point shortly.)

As we said above, there were in fact cases of “slave owners” purchasing slaves to help them—not just to keep them from starving, but also to rescue them from worse fates at the hands of other, more rapacious and tyrannical slave owners. Amazing, but true. Ironically, one could reasonably liken such a move to the act of taking in refugees.

Recall that the slaves were not citizens, and the best life they could hope for was to be “owned” by a kind master, rather than a psychopathic one. Obviously, that’s a mind-numbingly shitty situation to deal with—but the point is that, while many of the plantation owners abused their slaves, it would appear the Founders, specifically, were cut from a very different cloth. That they themselves owned slaves is not, in and of itself, proof of anything in particular. Many of Jeffersons slaves, for example, were taught how to read and later became property owners.

Alas, by the time the founders declared independence, slavery had already been in existence in America for quite some time. Though the founders themselves wished to eradicate slavery, not everyone was on board. There was the possibility of intense backlash by other moneyed interests also inhabiting America at the time. They had to strike a balance between emancipation on the one hand, and maintaining peace on the other. If they opened the floodgates all at once, they faced the real possibility of being destroyed by the ensuing chaos.

Nonetheless, despite the founders generally preferring gradual emancipation, in Virginia there WAS a mass exodus of slaves immediate following the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The population of free Black men skyrocketed from 1% to 10% of the total population within the year.

On that Note, Were All the Slaves Black?

Before we unintentionally and inadvertently suggest that slaves were always Black, it must also be noted that many slaves were White as well. In addition to procuring slaves from Africa, the British and Dutch elite were also pillaging Ireland in particular, and this process went on for decades and decades. The so-called “potato famine” is an absolutely ridiculous lie that was invented to cover up the truth—the Irish did NOT starve en masse simply because one type of food allegedly disappeared.

They had grains. They had other vegetables. They had meat. To insinuate that they perished in great numbers just because they didn’t have potatoes is downright insulting. No student of history, if they were to apply some objective thinking to the matter, could take that narrative seriously. No, the Irish were being kidnapped and slaughtered relentlessly. THAT’s the real truth! Many of these Irish slaves were brought to the colonies and to Barbados as well.

As we stated above, the early Americans simply weren’t the evil “white supremacists” modern history (read: propaganda) claims they were, and it’s well past time this became widely understood. If you ask me, a fundamental characteristic of anyone would call themselves a true America is to be eternally willing to stand against tyranny—regardless of all other things, I do not consider someone to be a true American unless they possess that trait.

For Me, this is Personal

My own great grandfather, Roger Conant, and his family arrived at the colonies in 1623, along with many others known as the Puritans. He was one of the founders of Salem, Massachusetts, and some regard him as the first “unofficial governor” of the Massachusetts colony—”officially” speaking, the office of governor had not yet been established when he arrived.

Unfortunately, many of the letters and records regarding the early Puritans perished in a great fire at Westminster Hall in 1666… a rather interesting date for a such an event to happen, no?

My grandfather, and many of his associates wrote of their reasons for leaving England, and though his specific letters did not survive, it would appear that he and his associates left England precisely because they believed that the Church of England was not a valid church of Christ—the clergy, it was said, were hypocritical and lived lives of opulence. They did not embody the virtues they claimed to profess. Many people left England for many reasons, but this is what we know of my grandfather and many who ended up in the Massachusetts Colony.

Amazingly, I did find a document (published in 1901) that reported that he and his crew formed a rather quick alliance with the Naumkeug tribe, who themselves were at war with other neighboring tribes. It is reported that some of these early settlers and the natives began building roads/pathways to each others houses within a month of my grandfather’s arrival. Talk about making fast friends! Again, the mainstream narratives that categorically portray the early settlers as evil bigots don’t hold up to genuine scrutiny.

I have yet to do a deep dive into the famous Salem witch trials, but I would not be surprised one bit to discover that that story is also full of details that would exonerate, rather than vilify, many of the early settlers. After all, much of mainstream “history” has been written by people possessed of a hysterical hatred of my grandfather and everyone like him—and so we can reasonably assume that most of their works are slanted in the same direction.

The point is, the same spirit of freedom that gave us the Declaration of Independence was already present in the colonies many decades before the Declaration was signed. The call to freedom did not arise out of a vacuum, but out of a remarkable group of people who were prepared to endure unimaginable hardships in order to live up to certain ideals that they held to be sacred.

The Sacrifices of the Founders

I will end this post by sharing with you something I saw on Twitter this morning, and which inspired me to write what I’ve written today. The Red Headed Libertarian shared a quote this morning (originally written by a man named Michael Smith) detailing the sacrifices America’s Founding Fathers made to bring America into being. Indeed, theirs is a story that ought to be retold every year on this day.

“Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died. Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons in the revolutionary army, another had two sons captured. Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the revolutionary war.

They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. What kind of men were they? Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners, men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags. Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers or both, looted the properties of Ellery, Clymer, Hall, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton. At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. The owner quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months. John Hart was driven from his wife’s bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks later he died from exhaustion and a broken heart. Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates. Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution.

These were not wild eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more. Standing tall, straight, and unwavering, they pledged: ‘For the support of this declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.’”

Our gratitude to these men can never be over-expressed. They deserve eternal recognition for what they endured so that genuine freedom may have a chance at manifesting upon the face of the Earth.

Happy 4th of July!

2024 UPDATE:

My sincerest gratitude goes out to all of you who have read this far—as a reward to you guys, I have another mind-blowing idea to share with you about America’s past.

Something hit me a couple years ago like a proverbial freight train to the head: if the early colonists were at war with the “Indians”, then why are so many states (and towns, roads, etc.) in America named after them?

Massachusetts, the Dakotas, Minnesota… none of these names are European in origin. Usually, when one group “conquers” another they rename the territory. It’s highly anomalous to adopt the names of the very people one was fighting.

Imagine naming your own children after your enemies—would that not be an absurd thing to do? If you think about it, that’s not too different from naming ones town or state after your enemies—and so the near ubiquitous prevalence of Native names in America seems to fly in the face of the history that we were taught. It the Europeans came solely to make America in their own image (as is implied by mainstream history), then ALL of the states would have names like Rhode Island, Washington, Louisiana, Vermont, etc.

Some may argue, “but there are hundreds of books detailing the history of Indian genocide”—to which I say, what does it matter? Historical scholarship SHOULD be concerned with proving or disproving various assertions about what once was… Instead, people repeat what they were told, and then the sheer ubiquity of a given narrative somehow becomes evidence of it’s “correctness”. Historical frauds are the easiest thing in the world to carry out if you have control over the media.

(Fun fact: did you know that Ghislane Maxwells dad, Robert Maxwell, owns McGraw-Hill Publishing… which prints the vast majority of the “educational” materials used in American public schools?)

Anyways…

For a period of time, I lived in Virginia in a town way out in the middle of nowhere, with a very small population of people (approx. 1,000). According to the locals—whose history has been ignored precisely for not fitting the mainstream narrative—the Natives and Europeans got along without issue there for hundreds of years. They even mutually agreed as to what parts of the land were to be respected as sacred hunting grounds. I don’t have any sources on this other than what I heard by word of mouth, but that story is far more credible in my opinion than most of what I was taught in school.

Don’t get me wrong—I do believe that battles between Natives and Europeans took place. But given that we use Native names all over the place here in America, I reckon that said battles were not as plentiful as we were told. I can’t tell you the real story here, but I do know that the official story CAN’T be correct. We wouldn’t have named so many things in America after the Native Tribes if we only saw them as our mortal enemies with whom we were in a bitter conflict for land.

I currently believe that a mass genocide of the Natives was undertaken by a very different group of people than your average European “colonist”, and that the blame has been intentionally misplaced. As the famous saying goes, “the victor always writes history”—do you honestly think the “victor” would portray themselves as slavers and genociders in their history books, or place the blame somewhere else? With enough money, one could create HUNDREDS of books portraying history a certain way…

I currently place the blame at the feet of the Dutch East India Company—I believe they were the ones mostly responsible for the slave trade and the genocide of the native tribes. The Crown is implicated as well—as is the entire structure of “occult power” that has been running the show in the background for centuries.

But probably not for much longer…

And with that… I’m off to go get ready for tonights fireworks. Stay tuned because, as always, more astounding discoveries are on their way…

I wish everyone a blessed 4th of July! Godbless and Godspeed Frens.