Is Andrew Tate the Epstein of the Right?
He Might as Well Be...
DISCLAIMER: the accusations made against the Tate brothers are not mine—they are based directly on statements made by the Tate brothers themselves. Nothing herein shall be construed as legal advice in any way.
My Appeal to Tate Fans
For a brief moment, I was one of you, until I learned who the Tate brothers really are. I get why his (allegedly) “pro masculine” message resonates with so many of you.
The modern west is extremely hostile to masculinity, in ways that even MGTOW types don’t fully comprehend. Men aren’t just railroaded as a matter of course in family court—the war against men goes all the way down to the most fundamental, spiritual levels. (The same is true for women too, but we’ll get to that topic in later posts).
The key thing that every man needs in his life is to feel like a hero, but men are denied this in the west. Nothing kills the spirit of men quite like the feeling of being useless. Masculine energy can oftentimes be destructive when it’s not channeled in a healthy way; the solution to this problem is not to shame men for being what they are, but to give them viable pathways for become heroes. You can’t appreciate or work with men until you fully comprehend this fact.
Conmen such as the Tate brothers are well aware of the fact that men are literally starving to realize their masculinity in a positive way—if they didn’t play on this fact, then they wouldn’t have become so “popular”.
It’s important for men to feel loved, but if you really want to restore a man to full mental and emotional health, he needs to experience what it’s like to be admired as a hero because he legitimately earned it. That’s the missing ingredient in men’s mental health that will make all the difference. Men have an innate drive to become heroic (each in his own way), and if you take that away from them then you’ve killed their spirit—a society that treats its men like they’re nothing but losers, thugs, oppressors, and so on won’t last more than a generation or so. It literally can’t. Instilling in young boys the belief that their masculinity is wrong is one of the worst things you could do to them.
One of the reasons Andrew Tate became popular is because many young men have been hearing for most of their lives how useless they are. So when someone like Andrew Tate comes along and says, “no, that’s bullshit. You’re valuable because you’re a man. Society is out to get you, but I understand you” you can’t really blame them for resonating so strongly with such messages.
One of my first exposures to Andrew Tate was a clip of him ripping apart a downright weaselly male feminist who had smugly opined that only “toxic” men are interested in “icky” things like guns or combat. The feigned moral superiority was a bit much to take (I try to be as understanding as possible of as many people as possible—I feel have I have duty to do that as a hypnotherapist—but we all have our limits).
Personally, I’m done hearing people shame men for their natural protective instincts, so Tate’s response landed well with me when he yelled back to the guy (I’m paraphrasing) “the moment there’s a problem you’ll just call a policeman—another man who’s toxic and knows how to fight. You don’t really have a problem with toxic masculinity, you just want someone else to do it for you.”
It was refreshing to hear that guy get put in his place. I think I can speak on behalf of most men when I say that it can be genuinely revolting to be told by another dude who probably never had to fight a day in his life that it’s somehow “wrong” to be interested in physical combat and self-defense because it’s “gross” and “icky”; the main reason why there are men in this world who are privileged enough to never have to fight is because other men have paid the price to make that possible.
Instead of telling men that their romantic desires and protectives instincts are “toxic” we should be grateful instead. The masculine urges to be seen as a hero and be loved by beautiful women (hopefully ending up with a wife and family) are part of what makes civilization possible—to shame men for being what they are makes as much sense as shaming birds for flying in the air, or fish for swimming in water. Or, for that matter, women for generally preferring taller men.
There are plenty of young men who are raised by feminist single mothers, who then go to school where they are “educated” by feminist teachers, and are directly and indirectly told everyday that they are evil oppressors, that they “ain’t shit”, that they’re creeps for being attracted to women at all, and so on. Like the seasoned groomer he is, Tate intentionally profits on the misery of young men who desperately need an influential figure in their life to tell them that their masculinity is valuable and that they can become the hero of their own story.
Even trained hypnotists get fooled from time to time—like I said, my initial impression of the Tate brothers was a positive one. That is, until I learned who they really are. Now I think they’re fundamentally evil psychopaths who need to be permanently removed from society. I mean every word of that. Some might find that harsh, and that’s cool with me, but that’s my honest opinion and I’m sticking to it. This won’t be the only post exposing them for the evil scumbags that they are.
We’re going to get into the evidence against them in a moment. But first, a quick note on hypnosis in general.
(As far as the public is concerned, Andrew Tate is the figurehead of the Tate enterprise, so we will focus on him—but that said, just about everything that can be said of Andrew can also be said of his brother, Tristan. They seem to be conjoined at the hip, so to speak, and do everything together.)
Andrew Tate is a Hypnotist for Disenfranchised Men
There’s a difference between refusing to see something and simply being unable to see it—hypnotic deletion of sensory material can sometimes occur when sufficient levels of cognitive dissonance have set in.
Some people don’t have morals, and therefore don’t give a damn if Tate traffics in young girls or not. They simply don’t give shit. Some people have no humanity in them whatsoever, and good people often find this fact to be extremely baffling—psychopathic personality types count on good people being naive to their true natures. The public desperately needs a better “immune” response to psychopathy.
I believe that many of Tate’s fans—particularly the younger ones—are suffering from cognitive dissonance. It’s extremely hard to square the fact that someone who made them feel for the first time in their entire life that their masculinity mattered is actually a despicable excuse for a man himself. People have an inborn need to defend those who give them as sense of identity—for better or for worse.
Now you understand the fundamental psychological dynamic playing out here. Depending on how deep the programming runs, hypnotic deletion of unwanted truth can occur. I believe that there are many well meaning people who simply can’t cognize the concept that the Tates are evil scumbags.
In sum: some people don’t care, some people are afraid to acknowledge the truth, and others are quite literally incapable of perceiving the truth in the first place. These are the 3 main classes of Tate fans.
Right now, there are far too many people claiming “there isn’t any evidence” against the Tates that prove their culpability in human trafficking operations. Unfortunately, this is helping perpetuate the hypnotic bubble that still somewhat protects them. How long will this bubble last? I can’t tell, but I believe that, even if they make it out of their current troubles, they’re stupid enough get themselves put away eventually. It’s really just a matter of time.
Either way, it’s time to confront the real evidence against the Tates.
Meet the Real Andrew Tate
As the video below demonstrates, they are human traffickers. Plain and simple. It’s not a matter of subjective opinion—by common legal definition, they engage in trafficking. The following video proves this.
The end of this video asks, were any of the girls Tate employed in his cam business underage? Most likely yes. We do know that one of the main “recruiters” for Andrew Tate was a woman who he began dating at 15 years old—I forget whether or not this woman was doing recruitment for Tate prior to turning 18 or not, but either way, the following video is absolutely damning.
As an aside, I consider Authentic Observer to be one of the most astute observers of human nature I’ve ever come across on youtube. Her work is well worth the investment to watch/listen to. But I digress.
Here we have a video of the Tates blatantly describing how they seek young, economically vulnerable women to do cam work for them because it’s easier to manipulate them compared to women that came from economically stable, loving homes.
How many times does a man have to tell the world who he is before the world believes him?
Why Compare the Andrew Tate to Epstein?
I have two reasons for this.
Firstly, Andrew Tate is a self admitted admirer of Jeffrey Epstein, so it’s not unreasonable to think of him as a sort of “wannabe” version of Epstein.
(QUICK NOTE: to prove this, I was going to share an image from a twitter handle that’s currently suspended. Alas, I’m not sure at the moment where else to locate the same evidence. Hopefully we’ll have something here soon, but I assure you that, yes, Andrew Tate really does admire Epstein. That’s a promise.)
But secondly, this is the framing that I predict will be used against the right the moment that the Tate’s are convicted of trafficking in Romania (or, failing that, whenever it inevitably happens somewhere else). Personally, I’m quite convinced that there’s a massive ring of corruption in right wing (or so-called “non partisan”) media, and that the Tate’s rise to stardom is merely a symptom of it.
Left wing media is worse on the whole (as far as I’m currently aware, they’re the ones more culpable for protecting Epstein from scrutiny for years), but the fact that the right can’t keep traffickers out of their ranks is very telling. There are too many people turning a blind eye to the obvious evidence against them. I get that many people are squeamish about “becoming a part of cancel culture”, but, if you really think about it, canceling human traffickers means less human trafficking. Does it not?
You can either be pro “traditional conservative values” or you can turn a blind eye to traffickers—but you can’t do both at the same time.
A Brief Word about TRUE Masculinity
Raw physical strength does not make a man. What a man does with his strength is what makes the difference.
Imagine a bodybuilder violently pushing around a small girl simply because he’s having a bad day and can’t control himself. Do you instinctively regard this “man” as true leader of men? As a model of the Divine Masculine incarnate? Or do you see him as a pathetic, contemptible loser who’s undeserving of the slightest shred of respect?
I rest my case against the Tates.
As for his defenders in the media, I have more material on them coming up soon in future posts. I wasn’t kidding when I said I’m pretty sure I’ve identified a corruption ring within so-called “right wing” media…
They are definitely low class criminals, like the others that float to the top.